RE: Future of openLilyLib

[Daniel Rosen]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:12 AM
> To: Karsten Reincke <k.reincke@fodina.de>
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Carl Sorensen <carl.d.sorensen@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Future of openLilyLib
>
> Karsten Reincke <k.reincke@fodina.de> writes:
>
> > Summary:
> >
> > If I wrote a piece of music using LilyPond Code (for being interpreted 
> > by the Lilypond interpreter) and if I included OpenLilyLib into my 
> > code,
>
> If you include OLL code by copy into your source code.  If you use its 
> advertised interfaces, however, that does not make it part of your code.

I'm not saying I disagree with your interpretation, I'm just curious: are you 
aware of any legal precedent (in the common-law sense) or law code supporting 
it?

DR