[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 04:23:47 -0600 (CST) |
On 10-Feb-1999, Joao Cardoso <address@hidden> wrote:
| O. Scott Sands wrote:
|
| > Octave 2.1.13 fails to complete building
| > during final link. Lots of complaining about
| > 'undefined reference in liboctave.so and
| > liboctinterp.so. I don't have a clue about
| > what this means or what to do. Specifics:
| >
| > S.u.S.e. linux 5.3: Linux kernel 2.0.35 gcc 2.7.2.1
| > gnu libc 1.09 beta (that's what the manual says)
|
| Hi,
|
| You need gcc-2.8.x or egcs-1.1.x, I guess.
I don't know what the real problem is, but 2.1.x should not require
gcc 2..8.x or egcs. I build it all the time using gcc 2.7.2.1 on a
S.u.S.E. 5.0 system.
jwe
- Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, O. Scott Sands, 1999/02/10
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Daniel Heiserer, 1999/02/10
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Thomas Walter, 1999/02/10
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Joao Cardoso, 1999/02/10
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, O. Scott Sands, 1999/02/11
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Thomas Walter, 1999/02/16
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Joao Cardoso, 1999/02/16
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Thomas Walter, 1999/02/17
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Joao Cardoso, 1999/02/17
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Thomas Walter, 1999/02/18
- Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13, Joao Cardoso, 1999/02/18
- text and numbers, Huaiyu Zhu, 1999/02/17
- Re: text and numbers, Daniel Heiserer, 1999/02/18
- Re: text and numbers, Karim Elaagouby, 1999/02/18