Re: Need a clue about compile failure in 2.1.13

[O. Scott Sands]

John W. Eaton wrote:

> On 10-Feb-1999, Joao Cardoso <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> | O. Scott Sands wrote:
> |
> | > Octave 2.1.13 fails to complete building
> | > during final link. Lots of complaining about
> | > 'undefined reference in liboctave.so and
> | > liboctinterp.so. I don't have a clue about
> | > what this means or what to do. Specifics:
> | >
> | > S.u.S.e. linux 5.3: Linux kernel 2.0.35 gcc 2.7.2.1
> | > gnu libc 1.09 beta (that's what the manual says)
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> | You need gcc-2.8.x or egcs-1.1.x, I guess.
>
> I don't know what the real problem is, but 2.1.x should not require
> gcc 2..8.x or egcs.  I build it all the time using gcc 2.7.2.1 on a
> S.u.S.E. 5.0 system.
>
> jwe

I've been able to get 2.1.13 to work using only

./configure --enable-shared --enable-lite-kernel

which was all that was important to me.  Thanks for
the tips. Especially the tip from Daniel Heiserer
And now....

....back to plplot ...

oss


--

O. Scott Sands
address@hidden