[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2019 06:34:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 |
Looks good to me. Could you please push it to gnunet-*, libextractor,
libmicrohttpd and the taler-* Git repos? Thanks! -Christian
On 3/14/19 1:15 PM, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Hi
>> I'd say no tabs at all (in C code or texinfo), no trailing whitespace
>> (also not in C, Makefile.am, ChangeLog, texinfo, etc.).
>
> This is my proposed .dir-locals.el, setting some more variables being
> handy (like spell-checker directory):
>
> ((nil
> . ((fill-column . 78)
> (tab-width . 4)
> (indent-tabs-mode . nil)
> (show-trailing-whitespace . t)
> (c-basic-offset . 2)
> (ispell-check-comments . exclusive)
> (ispell-local-dictionary . "american")
> (safe-local-variable-values
> '((c-default-style . "gnu")
> (sentence-end-double-space . f)
> (eval add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'flyspell-prog-mode)
> (flyspell-issue-message-flag . f) ; avoid messages for every word
> )))))
>
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, IC Rainbow, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected,
Christian Grothoff <=
- [GNUnet-developers] .dir-local.el for all/most repos, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15