[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work
From: |
IC Rainbow |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:35:59 +0300 |
By the way, there is a common format for basic formatting:
https://editorconfig.org/
That may help people without emacs at hand to have correct formatting
before git hooks kick in.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:15 PM Hartmut Goebel
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi
> > I'd say no tabs at all (in C code or texinfo), no trailing whitespace
> > (also not in C, Makefile.am, ChangeLog, texinfo, etc.).
>
> This is my proposed .dir-locals.el, setting some more variables being
> handy (like spell-checker directory):
>
> ((nil
> . ((fill-column . 78)
> (tab-width . 4)
> (indent-tabs-mode . nil)
> (show-trailing-whitespace . t)
> (c-basic-offset . 2)
> (ispell-check-comments . exclusive)
> (ispell-local-dictionary . "american")
> (safe-local-variable-values
> '((c-default-style . "gnu")
> (sentence-end-double-space . f)
> (eval add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'flyspell-prog-mode)
> (flyspell-issue-message-flag . f) ; avoid messages for every word
> )))))
>
> --
> Regards
> Hartmut Goebel
>
> | Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected,
IC Rainbow <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- [GNUnet-developers] .dir-local.el for all/most repos, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/15