[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:10:57 +0000 |
Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 3.5K bytes:
>
>
> > On 14. Mar 2019, at 09:10, Hartmut Goebel <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Am 13.03.19 um 19:16 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> >> In the end, please also check https://docs.gnunet.org/#Coding-style and
> >> adjust your editor to it.
> >> Currently, the file has mixed spaces and tabs which is quite unreadable
> >> (for me).
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out, I simply missed this. Coming form
> > Python-land, there is basically a single coding style :-)
> >
> > Can somebody provide me with a emacs ".dir-locals.el" file, please?
> > Generally, for emacs users adding a ".dir-locals.el" in to top level
> > directories of each project could configure the emacs to our coding style.
> >
> >
> > Am 13.03.19 um 22:29 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> >
> >> Either that or have a lint job in the pipeline in the CI.
> >
> > This but mess up the blame, too.
> >
>
> The lint job should not change things, just complain. Ideally, future
> automatic merges into master, for example, could be rejected if the linter
> complains.
Either a proper CI or extend what I started in lint/Makefile.am and the scripts
belonging to it.
Nothing in there changes code iirc, it just checks for correctness of code
and standards.
> >
> > Am 13.03.19 um 21:27 schrieb ng0:
> >> Okay. Works for C, but not in intendation enforcing languages (Python),
> >> where I've done it like this.
> >
> > Python already provides a moduel for this: tabnanny [1]
> >
> > python -m tabnanny file_or_directory ...
> >
> > [1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/tabnanny.html
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Hartmut Goebel
> >
> > | Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
> > | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, IC Rainbow, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- [GNUnet-developers] .dir-local.el for all/most repos, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected,
ng0 <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/16
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/16
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Please review: C implementation of gnunet-qr, ng0, 2019/03/04