[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:10:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 |
Am 13.03.19 um 19:16 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> In the end, please also check https://docs.gnunet.org/#Coding-style and
> adjust your editor to it.
> Currently, the file has mixed spaces and tabs which is quite unreadable (for
> me).
Thanks for pointing this out, I simply missed this. Coming form
Python-land, there is basically a single coding style :-)
Can somebody provide me with a emacs ".dir-locals.el" file, please?
Generally, for emacs users adding a ".dir-locals.el" in to top level
directories of each project could configure the emacs to our coding style.
Am 13.03.19 um 22:29 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> Either that or have a lint job in the pipeline in the CI.
This but mess up the blame, too.
Am 13.03.19 um 21:27 schrieb ng0:
> Okay. Works for C, but not in intendation enforcing languages (Python),
> where I've done it like this.
Python already provides a moduel for this: tabnanny [1]
python -m tabnanny file_or_directory ...
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/tabnanny.html
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, IC Rainbow, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- [GNUnet-developers] .dir-local.el for all/most repos, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected,
Hartmut Goebel <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/16
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/16
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Please review: C implementation of gnunet-qr, ng0, 2019/03/04