Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected

[Schanzenbach, Martin]

> On 14. Mar 2019, at 09:10, Hartmut Goebel <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Am 13.03.19 um 19:16 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
>> In the end, please also check https://docs.gnunet.org/#Coding-style and 
>> adjust your editor to it.
>> Currently, the file has mixed spaces and tabs which is quite unreadable (for 
>> me).
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out, I simply missed this. Coming form
> Python-land, there is basically a single coding style :-)
> 
> Can somebody provide me with a emacs ".dir-locals.el" file, please?
> Generally, for emacs users adding a ".dir-locals.el" in to top level
> directories of each project could configure the emacs to our coding style.
> 
> 
> Am 13.03.19 um 22:29 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> 
>> Either that or have a lint job in the pipeline in the CI.
> 
> This but mess up the blame, too.
> 

The lint job should not change things, just complain. Ideally,  future 
automatic merges into master, for example, could be rejected if the linter 
complains.

> 
> Am 13.03.19 um 21:27 schrieb ng0:
>> Okay. Works for C, but not in intendation enforcing languages (Python),
>> where I've done it like this.
> 
> Python already provides a moduel for this: tabnanny [1]
> 
>    python -m tabnanny file_or_directory ...
> 
> [1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/tabnanny.html
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Regards
> Hartmut Goebel
> 
> | Hartmut Goebel          | address@hidden               |
> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP