[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2019 01:32:59 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexandre François Garreau <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le samedi 9 novembre 2019, 21:44:46 CET Dmitry Alexandrov a écrit :
>> In the light of yet another letter from your impostor, do you have any more
>> unresolved questions, that impede you from starting to sign mail? Feel free
>> to ask them.
>
> Note signing can be avoided with effective spf policy.
No, it can not. SPF has nothing to do with message headers. Itʼs an antispam
measure, that can help to detect fakes when one tries to fake a domain name of
his _SMTP-server_ (e. g. claim that his 89.184.73.65 is not nvs406.mirohost.net
but fencepost.gnu.org), but our impostor have not bothered to do it.
GPG can be avoided by choosing DKIM instead (+ optionally a DMARC policy), but
this _is_ a cryptographic signature.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/01
- Re: Why donÊüt gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/01
- Re: Why don�Š�¼t gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Jean Louis, 2019/11/01
- Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/02
- Re: Why donÃÆÃ
 Ãâüt gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/03
- Re: Why donʼt gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/03
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/09
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/09
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?,
Dmitry Alexandrov <=
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/09
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/09
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/10