[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 19:11:20 +0100 |
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 04:09:45 CET, vous avez écrit :
> > Purism do not respect users’ freedom:
> > https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported
> That statement is true at one level, unfair at another level.
> This is not entirely satisfactory, I agree. But it isn't Purism's
> fault. People must make up their own minds about whether this
> is good enough, but don't condemn Purism for it.
Respecting users’ freedom would be selling libreboot(able)ed machines, as
these are already easy to get, make, sell, and/or buy. They claim doing so,
while it’s not true.
The problem is their marketing and campaigning is full of hyperboles, and
exclusively turned around themselves, never speaking about alternatives or
other initiatives… and yet this is to be expected from a company managing big
quantities of money, it is much more unfair when this communication is about
freedom, community and sharing.
They contribute to transform into an arbitrary added-value label (that is:
lux) “freedom” and maybe even one day “ryf” (such as what happened to
“organic” or “biological” with green-washing… so is happening with
“openwashing” (…and now even “librewashing” thanks purism)), so it becomes
much less meaningful and stable, and much more arbitrary and market-dependent,
while becoming unaccessible to the poors (who would best need it), while until
now free software has always been something actually *more* known (if not
proportionally, at least in absolute) and accessible among them. [0]
On the other side, ThinkPenguin is precisely at the same level of freedom-
respect (even more, as they already sell several RYF products), while being a
lot less unfair in their marketing and communication: they’re not the best,
but they sell useful stuff, for a price it may be worth.
ThinkPenguin do not say they’re the “best” (implying the rest is strictly
worse, wich is a lie), they’re “to be bought”, “to be pure”, or anything so
moralizing (hence culpabizing) as purism. Purism, through their website (and
to some extent its name too) makes it look like their stuff is a “must”, “to be
own” that shall not be missed or then you’re missing or failing something (so
maybe if you’re too poor for it you’re too poor for free software (at least
that might what they website might reflect (while they sell specially recent
and high-performance hardware bound with special paid support (in that extent
they’re maybe even participating in “service replacing product” modern
economic trend)))). To see this in market is to be expected, but for a
special-software-freedom company, rooted in free-software community, this is
new and affraying.
[0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower
freedom and moral standards than GNU, I fear without you it may grows even
worse and effectively one day become that (as it is currently still FSF
delivering the RYF label).
- Re: Why don�üt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server), (continued)
- Re: Why don�üt gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server), Richard Stallman, 2019/11/01
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? (was: Testing new mail server), Jean Louis, 2019/11/01
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, gameonlinux, 2019/11/03
- Message not available
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail?, gameonlinux, 2019/11/04
- Message not available
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, gameonlinux, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Jean Louis, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, gameonlinux, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Jean Louis, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/04
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto,
Alexandre François Garreau <=
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Jean Louis, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Jean Louis, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/05
- Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto, Jean Louis, 2019/11/05
- Re: Magnesium (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto), Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/05