[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grammar checking
From: |
Felician Nemeth |
Subject: |
Re: Grammar checking |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:44:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
> One issue with Eglot is that afaik it currently only allows for one
> language server to be active at a time, so if I want to check the
> grammar I need to switch the active LSP server. I think it was
> mentioned as a possible feature in the future to allow different
> simultaneous language servers for different LSP capabilities, maybe
> one main one for completion and thinks like rename and two LSP's for
> linting, for instance.
Instead of enhancing Eglot to work with multiple LSP servers in
parallel, we talked in the past about the idea of an
lsp-proxy/lsp-multiplexer that is independent of Eglot, shows itself as
an ordinary LSP client to Eglot, but also starts multiple LSP severs and
behaves as a client to these servers.
Now I'm only able to find these pointers about this:
https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/issues/249#issuecomment-482561502
https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/issues/90#issuecomment-443906068
This approach would keep Eglot relatively simple, and may result in a
project that cloud also attract contributors outside of the Emacs
community.
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Nasser Alkmim, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking,
Felician Nemeth <=
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), João Távora, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/31
Re: Re: jinx, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/03/31