[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:55 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> jinx spell-checks the visible portion of the window. I don't see why
> we would need that. Suppose I scroll the window by 2 lines: why would
> I want the new visible portion to be spell-checked again, when the
> overlap with the last check is so large?
You mean, it doesn't remember which part has already been checked?
I took for granted it would optimize by not rechecking what was
already on the window.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Nasser Alkmim, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Felician Nemeth, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), João Távora, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Re: jinx, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/03/31