[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: jinx
From: |
Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez |
Subject: |
Re: Re: jinx |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:41:57 +0200 |
Philip Kaludercic writes:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> >
> > > ispell already supports enchant, but it communicates via IPC instead of
> > > the library interface.
> >
> > Would it be possible for jinx to do this?
> > Would it be better overall for jinx to do this?
>
> Do what? Jinx /does/ use the enchant library, ispell /does/ use IPC.
We already have a nice solution based on enchant with flyspell. It is
very well documented and I'm using it in a multi-lingual environment
with Spanish (Castillian), German (1909 - I refuse to learn Kohl's ;-)
); (British) English and Italian. I'd like to try out jinx, but I'd
need more documentation ... and time
My .2cents, /PA
--
Fragen sind nicht da um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler
Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should
run a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
- Re: Grammar checking, Nasser Alkmim, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Felician Nemeth, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), João Távora, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/31
Re: Re: jinx,
Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <=