[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:57 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > > ispell already supports enchant, but it communicates via IPC instead
of
> > > the library interface.
> >
> > Would it be possible for jinx to do this?
> > Would it be better overall for jinx to do this?
> Do what?
Communicate with enchant via IPC.
I understood the other person to be saying that communicating that way
is an advantage for ispell. If it is an advantage, could jinx be made
to do it that way?
Maybe perse did not mean that this was an advantage.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/28
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, João Pedro, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/30
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31