[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:23 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> But as far as I know it doesn't have yet the ability to check and
> list the spelling mistakes in the entire buffer. Therefore, I will
> probably still be using ispell-buffer to iterate through all
> spelling errors.
It was pointed out that there is a way to do this. Of course, if we
install it in Emacs we could adjust the calling conventions however we
think users will like. We could make `ispell-buffer' call jinx
if that's what we want.
Given that, do you still think you would have a need for the existing
`ispell-buffer' that uses ispell.el, if jinx were always available?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/03/28
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, João Pedro, 2023/03/29
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/30
- Re: jinx,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: jinx, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking (was: jinx), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/31
- Re: Grammar checking, Peter Oliver, 2023/03/31