[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unboxed package manager
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unboxed package manager |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:23:39 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:52:20 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
> cc: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>
> > You could construct a test without external packages by just generating
> > N directories, prepending them to the load path, then doing the same
> > loadall to see if the degradation is purely due to the size of the load
> > path.
> >
>
> Indeed, with the attached file, emacs -Q -l loadall.el takes 120 seconds.
> Hmmm...
Why are you surprised? Having 2000 directories in your load-path is a
bad idea regardless.
- Re: Unboxed package manager, (continued)
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/22
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/20
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/20
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/20
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Gregory Heytings, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/21
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/22
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/22
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/23
- Re: Unboxed package manager, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/03/23
- Re: Unboxed package manager, chad, 2023/03/24