Re: Unboxed package manager

[Augusto Stoffel]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 19:10, Philip Kaludercic wrote:

> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 15:25, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
> There is no strict need for this to be a package manager.  I propose
> something like that a year ago:
>
>   https://wwwcip.cs.fau.de/~oj14ozun/src+etc/site-lisp.el
>
> In principle I could bundle this into a package and add it to ELPA.

Yes, I remember that.  And if memory serves someone argued that this
could be greatly generalized and etc., which is probably true.

Anyway, I think it makes sense for basic things one needs to write a
sensible configuration to be built in, but if there's no consensus as to
how the ideal "site-lisp.el" should look like, then a package is better
than nothing.