[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous increme
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:25:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) |
Michael Terry wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Edgar Soldin <address@hidden> wrote:
>> the log level hint might help people familiar with and searching for
>> this term. Of course this makes only sense if the --log-* commands
>> interpret it. Else we should think to differentiate the terms for both
>> outputs (output verbosity vs. log level). Let's see what Michael has to say.
>
> Sorry, I meant to reply to this, but forgot.
>
> -log-* commands do respect verbosity setting.
>
> The list of settings that Ken gave is accurate, but let me explain them a bit:
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(0), "ERROR")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(1), "WARNING")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(2), "WARNING")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(3), "NOTICE")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(4), "NOTICE")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(5), "INFO")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(6), "INFO")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(7), "INFO")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(8), "INFO")
> logging.addLevelName(DupToLoggerLevel(9), "DEBUG")
>
> In the code, there are standard mappings from log.Error to specific
> levels: 'Error' == 0, 'Warning' == 1, 'Notice' == 3, 'Info' == 5, and
> 'Debug' == 9. There are duplicate levels per name because some levels
> just didn't have names and I needed something. Please don't change
> any of these level names without good cause. This mapping is only for
> log-consuming programs.
I have a louse memory for numbers to levels, so I just made some changes
that make sense to me, as described in this CHANGELOG entry that should
go out in 0.5.14:
=====
Changed from log.Log with numbered log levels to log.Debug,
log.Info, log.Notice, log.Warn, log.FatalError as below:
0 log.FatalError
1-2 log.Warn
3-4 log.Notice
5-8 log.Info
9 log.Debug
The -vN option has not changed. It is suggested that you
run at log level 3, Notice. Info and Debug are verbose.
=====
To me, these log levels make sense. I'd like to change the -vN option
as well, but left it. I'm thinking it should accept both numeric and
symbolic names, at least for a while, something like -vI[NFO] where only
the first character is required.
What do you think? Will this break anything, or will it make life
easier? I know that for me it will make programming easier since I've
got symbolic names now. It's in CVS so you can check it out.
...Ken
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Maurizio Vitale, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Richard Scott, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/27
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, edgar . soldin, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25