[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous increm
From: |
Michael Terry |
Subject: |
Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:29:49 -0400 |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Changed from log.Log with numbered log levels to log.Debug,
> log.Info, log.Notice, log.Warn, log.FatalError as below:
I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that the code will now only
have 5 levels instead of 10?
> What do you think? Will this break anything, or will it make life
> easier? I know that for me it will make programming easier since I've
> got symbolic names now. It's in CVS so you can check it out.
As long as the logging output itself is unchanged and duplicity still
accepts -v9, it won't break deja-dup.
I can definitely imagine it makes the code cleaner and easier to
understand, so I'm for it.
-mt
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Maurizio Vitale, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Richard Scott, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/27
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, edgar . soldin, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?,
Michael Terry <=
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25