[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:25:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) |
The -v9 option will indeed tell you what is different, but the output is
so verbose its lost in the noise.
Use -v4 for this. There will be a lot less noise and the differences
will show up in lines that begin with "Difference found:".
I think the log level should be moved down to 3 (default) on this one.
Opinions?
...Ken
Richard Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an active S3 backup routine setup and I've not had issues backing up
> or restoring files.
>
> However, when I run this:
>
> # /usr/bin/duplicity verify -v 9 --archive-dir=/var/lib/duplicity/etc
> s3+http://uniquefoldername/etc /etc
> Verify complete: 1162 files compared, 1 difference found.
>
> I don't know how to display what the difference is?
>
> I get vary little output... I thought the "-v 9" would turn on verbose output?
>
> I have the following installed:
>
> app-backup/duplicity-0.5.12
> dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4
> dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r7
> dev-python/boto-1.6b
> dev-python/py-gnupg-0.3.2
> dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r6
>
> # python -V
> Python 2.5.2
>
> Ken, is there any commands I can test or check for you?
>
> Rich.
>
>> It turns out we're on the same system across the board. I thought I had
>> not upgraded to 8.04.2, but it looks like I did. 32-bit here as well.
>>
>> Not sure what's going on. If you get the chance, try a restore and make
>> sure its OK. I just don't see any problem from here. I do want to find it
>> though, so maybe
>> someone else can chip in.
>>
>> ...Ken
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Maurizio Vitale, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Richard Scott, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/25
- Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Edgar Soldin, 2009/03/25
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/27
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, edgar . soldin, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Michael Terry, 2009/03/30
- Re: Loglevels and Output ... WAS: Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals?, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/03/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] erroneous incrementals? verify failing? everything else seems okay?, Josh, 2009/03/25