Re: [avrdude-dev] attiny10 with ftdi and bitbang

[Hannes Weisbach]

Am 09.07.2012 um 16:01 schrieb Darell Tan:

> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Can I ask why you did not simply implement cmd_tpi, chip_erase,
> program_enable and initialize functions accordingly?
I did and I never said otherwise. I just don't like it, because it causes much 
code duplication. Have a look at what bitbang_chip_erase does in the TPI 
section and what usbasp_tpi_program_enable does.

As far as I can tell your understanding of avrftdi and avrdude is correct :)

Cheers,
Hannes