Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:

Tim> compute it, so why don't we substitute it too?)
>>  If we do compute it systematically, please, indeed, get rid of
>> ac_ln_s.  If not, I would not be against computing it anyway.

Tim> So it's OK to move the

Tim> AC_SUBST(LN_S, $as_ln_s)

Aaah!  That's a wholely different matter: as_, not ac_!

Tim> to _AS_PREPARE_LN_S 

Nope.  AC_SUBST lives in the AC_ world, which is on top of AS_.

Tim> and make AC_PROG_LN_S a virtual no-op?

AC_PROG_LN_S can be AC_SUBST(LN_S, $as_ln_s).