[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK |
Date: |
19 Sep 2001 16:51:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:
>> Don't you need an AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_LN_S])?
Tim> Yup - I originally checked against $as_ln_s, but remembered
Tim> Akim's "Don't use internal variables, Luke".
:) :) :)
The real words are ``never use internal variables in any other project
than Autoconf itself, and as much as possible, when people might
depend on some result, make it public, i.e., non ac_''.
Tim> So I changed it to $LN_S, but forgot that was only substituted if
Tim> AC_PROG_LN_S is invoked (does that make sense, btw? we always
Tim> compute it, so why don't we substitute it too?)
If we do compute it systematically, please, indeed, get rid of
ac_ln_s. If not, I would not be against computing it anyway.
- Re: binmode, (continued)
- (no subject), Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/16
- Re: (no subject), Akim Demaille, 2001/09/17
- Re: (no subject), Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/17
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Paul Eggert, 2001/09/17
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/18
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Akim Demaille, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Akim Demaille, 2001/09/20
(no subject), Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/16