|
| From: | Tim Van Holder |
| Subject: | Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:44:47 +0200 |
> AC_PROG_LN_S can be AC_SUBST(LN_S, $as_ln_s). It already is. So the lstat test can safely use $as_ln_s? Or does it have to AC_REQUIRE AC_PROG_LN_S and use $LN_S?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |