[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK |
|
Date: |
20 Sep 2001 18:58:19 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:
>> AC_PROG_LN_S can be AC_SUBST(LN_S, $as_ln_s).
Tim> It already is. So the lstat test can safely use $as_ln_s? Or
Tim> does it have to AC_REQUIRE AC_PROG_LN_S and use $LN_S?
Do whatever you want, the current status is OK.
In fact, what is actually lacking is AS_LN_S, hiding as_ln_s, hence LN_S.
- Re: (no subject), (continued)
- Re: (no subject), Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/17
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Paul Eggert, 2001/09/17
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/18
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Akim Demaille, 2001/09/19
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Akim Demaille, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK, Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/20
- Re: AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK,
Akim Demaille <=
(no subject), Tim Van Holder, 2001/09/16