[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Real RST possible?
From: |
Thomas Beierlein |
Subject: |
Re: Real RST possible? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:28:42 +0100 |
Hi Jim, Nate and Zoli,
we should keep in mind to integrate it in the flow of the qso,
especially in contests.
What I mean is running in CQ mode I need the RST of the other
station *before* answering his call and will get his RST in his reply.
Running in S&P I would first get my RST from him and only *afterwards*
need his RST for my reply.
Another question is if the operator uses ESM or not.
73, Tom
Am Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:52:46 +0100
schrieb Csahok Zoltan <address@hidden>:
> Hi Nate,
>
> Everything is possible. :-)
>
> An option I see could be making the exchange box wider to span the
> RST fields and let the user input the values. Optionally pre-fill
> with 599/59. Then upon storing the qso we would parse the first 2
> words and store them as RSTs.
>
> A bit tedious for the user to fill and navigate within the exchange
> field, but I assume these use cases are not focused on high Q rates.
>
>
> 73,
> Zoli
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 06:26:36PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2020 26 Jan 15:45 -0600, jim smith wrote:
> > > First, I know there is the CHANGE_RST directive, but for QRP
> > > contests (at least in the states), many times ops send an actual
> > > RST -- 33N, 439, etc. Is there any way to incorporate this in
> > > both the received stations data (I imagine it would be in the
> > > exchange field, like a serial number) and for the sending
> > > station?
> > >
> > > It would be helpful the above mentioned QRP contests, general
> > > ragchews and for SOTA operations as well.
> >
> > I have seen other loggers handle this so that in the case of Tlf,
> > Space would move the cursor from Call to the Exchange/Comment field
> > and Tab would cycle through all fields, i.e., Call-->RX RST-->TX
> > RST-->Exch-->Call, etc.
> >
> > As it is now, Space jumps from Call to Exch and then Tab must be
> > used to go back to Call as Exch can contain spaces to separate
> > exchange elements in some events. Loggers such as N1MM+ create
> > additional field entry boxes depending on the event and Space is
> > not allowed in any of them so it can be used as a "smart tab" that
> > jumps over RST fields, if present, and through all the other fields.
> >
> > The way Tlf is structured, it would take a lot to have separate
> > exchange fields, but it seems as though having Tab cycle through
> > all the fields could be doable. As I see it, when Tab enters an
> > RST field it could place the cursor under the first '9' and from
> > there the field edited as needed. I'm afraid I don't have the time
> > to code it for some months so maybe someone else can pick up the
> > idea if it is thought to be a good one and add it.
> >
> > 73, Nate
> >
--
"Do what is needful!"
Ursula LeGuin: Earthsea
--