|
From: | Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: | Re: [Swarm-Modelling] [Fwd: Re: [ABMs in finance] |
Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 23:25:50 -0600 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) |
Pietro Terna wrote:
Just to be clear, in this case the `trading rules' were not agent behaviors. The agents behaviors were assumed to be random, and the market mechanism, an order book, itself was modeled in a realistic way. This type of analytical model explained around 70% of the variance in the spread of book prices as a function of a set time-aggregated measurements from historical London Stock Exchange data -- different subsets of millions of observations per different stocks. Delving into the ecology of agents wasn't necessary.Some patterns seem to emerge just from the trading rules.*********
This is in contrast to the approach of building up a simulation model like ASM and expecting to reproduce global phenomena from different ensembles and parameterizations of agent behaviors. I don't doubt there are situations where it is useful to do employ the synthetic ASM approach, but if an explanations seems simple from theory or data mining, perhaps it just is?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |