[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: talking good
From: |
glen e. p. ropella |
Subject: |
Re: talking good |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:32:49 -0800 |
At 02:43 PM 1/19/00 -0500, you wrote:
I dunno what the most basic feasible shared language is.
You're right, of course. I tried to say that when I said
that "What it takes is a well-defined and complete method
for extracting well-formed requirements from them" whatever
that method may be. Having a common language is best.
However, I don't actually *teach* these people the common
language of systems engineering. That can't be done in
less than a year, I suspect. The point is that "systems
engineering" is semantically correct. Anyone who has
successfully engineered a few systems... i.e. designed
things that solve a problems ... is conversant in
systems engineering. They know what it takes to go from
scratch to a finished product when there's no textbook
algorithm that a technician could apply.
So, *if* they are that type of person, I can hammer out
some requirements within 2 days time. If, however, I
have to *teach* them anything, it takes longer.
As to a basic shared language, I have no clue what that
might be either. All I know is that I have remarkable
success in getting a well-formed model from people in
different domains as long as they have experience in
designing purposeful systems. This means that I pretty
much fail with marketers, advertisers, spin doctors,
and even facilitators. I suspect that it's because their
foci are outward looking, where a system or ontology already
exists and what they need to do is *place* the system or
configure the system, rather than design it.
This could have something to do with the difference between
usage and creation. I have more fun creating something than
I do using it.
glen
--
glen e. p. ropella =><= Feeding the hamster wheel. Hail Eris!
Home: http://www.swarm.com/gepr (505) 424-0448
Work: http://www.swarm.com (505) 995-0818
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, (continued)
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Darren Schreiber, 2000/01/18
- Swarm by example (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?), glen e. p. ropella, 2000/01/18
- Re: Swarm by example (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?), Joseph & Kathleen Villa, 2000/01/18
- Re: Swarm by example, Darren Schreiber, 2000/01/18
- Re: Swarm by example, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/01/18
- Swarm Example project (Re: Swarm by example (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source tomodel?), Paul Johnson, 2000/01/19
- Re: Swarm Example project (Re: Swarm by example (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source tomodel?), glen e. p. ropella, 2000/01/19
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Benedikt Stefansson, 2000/01/18
- Systems Engineering (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?), glen e. p. ropella, 2000/01/19
- talking good, Ginger Booth, 2000/01/19
- Re: talking good,
glen e. p. ropella <=
- Re: talking good, Ginger Booth, 2000/01/20
- Re: talking good, Kathy and Ray La Belle, 2000/01/22
- Re: talking good, Bill Griffin, 2000/01/22
- Re: talking good, Ginger Booth, 2000/01/22
- Shameless plug (was Re: Systems Engineering), Ralf Stephan, 2000/01/20
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/01/18
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Alex Lancaster, 2000/01/19
Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Miles Parker, 2000/01/18
Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, James Odell, 2000/01/18