[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: talking good
From: |
Ginger Booth |
Subject: |
Re: talking good |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:46:18 -0500 |
Kathy,
Your story is great! The poker chips are exactly what I meant by finding
some way to make a "shared experience." I may use poker chips some
time. :)
Best,
Ginger
Kathy and Ray La Belle wrote:
> I am afraid I can't help but respond to this one. I am trying to convince my
> management that we need to do complex modeling. I am an engineer. I design
> laundry machines. And believe me they are much more complicated than you would
> think. Ever tried to figure out how and why clothes move? How should they be
> moved to actually clean? We have some methods to do this. We run into
> difficulties in the area of sub-system intergration. It is difficult to feed
> the
> effects of the structure system into the fluid handling system (as an
> example).
>
> I keep trying to convince people that the water molecules only know certain
> things. If we model all the entities and all the rules of the groups of
> entities,
> it may be possible to understand these systems in a deeper way.
>
> I am an electrical engineer. I am working with some chemical and mechanical
> Phd
> types. I have a hubby (Ray) that just happens to program. How do I create a
> model? How do I get information from the Phd types that actually means
> something
> in the programming world? I am trying to create a simple model of diffusion
> in 2d
> as an exercise.
>
> My first attempt with the Phd types got me equations. I explained these were
> observed effects. This was definately NOT what I needed. And Ray could not use
> this to create a model.
>
> I went out and got some red, blue, and white poker chips and a table cloth
> with a
> "grid" on it. Of course, the Phd types laughed at me. But after I explained
> that
> the chips were entities and what did the individual entities know about their
> environment, they decided "hey this is cool". I grouped the blue chips and
> assigned a chip to each of the chemists. One was in the center of the group.
> Another was at the outer edge. I called the game "diffusion" and said the
> goal of
> the game was to get evenly diffused. And just to make it fun, they get to
> make up
> their own rules :)
>
> We discussed if how much each molecule would "know, feel, see" about its
> environment. Would they know about every molecule (chip) in existance? Or only
> the ones nearby?
>
> Initially, I started out with one entitiy type in a "empty space". Then we
> discussed using red chips as the medium and the blue as the ones to disperse.
> After we master "dispersion", we can make the "game" more complicated by
> assigning properties to the different entities such as hyrdophoblic &
> hydrophilic, miscible & immiscible, and even combining into new compounds. The
> point is to learn to think as a particular entity (or swarm) would think. We
> know
> if we are right if the emerged properties match all those complicated
> equations
> we use on the macro level.
>
> My counterparts went away and took the chips with them. After a few good
> arguments in their office, they came back with rules I could actually use! The
> main purpose of the exercise was to explain agent based modelling to them. I
> need
> them to learn to think "as if they were the entity". I may have to get tinker
> toys to show how molecular chains move ....
>
> I decided to tell you about this experience because this "game" could be used
> for
> all types of people. Alot of people need something visual to understand ideas.
> This concept can be transferred into other fields.
>
>
> Kathy
> La Belle
>
> Note: the opinions expressed by me do not represent the company I work for
> (disclaimer)
>
> ==================================
> Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
> esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
> please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
> body of the message.
> ==================================
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: Swarm by example, (continued)
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Benedikt Stefansson, 2000/01/18
- Systems Engineering (was Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?), glen e. p. ropella, 2000/01/19
- talking good, Ginger Booth, 2000/01/19
- Re: talking good, glen e. p. ropella, 2000/01/19
- Re: talking good, Ginger Booth, 2000/01/20
- Re: talking good, Kathy and Ray La Belle, 2000/01/22
- Re: talking good, Bill Griffin, 2000/01/22
- Re: talking good,
Ginger Booth <=
- Shameless plug (was Re: Systems Engineering), Ralf Stephan, 2000/01/20
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/01/18
- Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Alex Lancaster, 2000/01/19
Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, Miles Parker, 2000/01/18
Re: Open source? -> Need to read source to model?, James Odell, 2000/01/18