repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:40:48 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > although the website itself does not list specific licenses,
  > still, the sourceforge licensing requirements are more libre
  > than what is typical...
  > so, unless
  > the OSI approves some non-free licenses, sourceforge probably
  > satisfies A4, where most others would not

The OSI has approved several non-libre licenses.
One of them is the Reciprocal Public License.
Another is the Open Watfor license.

So this doesn't entirely satisfy A4, but comes closer.



-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]