[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:40:48 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> although the website itself does not list specific licenses,
> still, the sourceforge licensing requirements are more libre
> than what is typical...
> so, unless
> the OSI approves some non-free licenses, sourceforge probably
> satisfies A4, where most others would not
The OSI has approved several non-libre licenses.
One of them is the Reciprocal Public License.
Another is the Open Watfor license.
So this doesn't entirely satisfy A4, but comes closer.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/01
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/02
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/03
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/07
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/18
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/19
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/30
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/07