[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
|
From: |
bill-auger |
|
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:39:38 -0400 |
im asking what the notabug admin needs to do, in order to pass A2
- is it sufficient, if the forge has a single sentence, nearby
the license selector:
"We recommend that you use the GPLv3-or-later for your project"
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/01
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/02
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org,
bill-auger <=
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/07
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/18
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/19
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/30