Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org

[bill-auger]

On Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:27:44 -0400 Richard wrote:
> So it does not pass C5, even though the change needed to get there
> is much smaller now.

i will note that the entire choose-a-license website is
CC-licensed; and they accept pull requests - if C5 is the
only failing 'C' criteria, it wouldn't hurt if someone offered
the changes, that you suggest


On Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:27:44 -0400 Richard wrote:
> Is there any other remaining doubt about what to say about GitHub today?

surely, there is plenty - all of the them probably should have a
complete re-evaluation - the webby world moves very fast -
ideally, these would all be re-evaluated yearly

even if some forge can not meet all 'C' criteria, it could still
be informative to have a complete evaluation, even if that is
represented only in the form of the evaluation checklist on the
wiki