repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:27:45 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > the confusing part of that, is "-or-later" - it is not
  > technically possible for the forge to "offer" "-or-later" - that
  > is a maintenance task for the code maintainer, completely
  > unrelated to the initial license chooser -

The specific facts you cite are correct, but you're interpreting
"offer" in a narrow sense.  That doesn't serve our purposes.
The forge consists of what it says as well as what it technically does.

                                               for that reason, the
  > intention of C5, A2, and A3, could only be evident in the form
  > of documentation - the software has no way to enforce
  > "-or-later", nor to assist with implementing it - all they can

Yes it can.  Simply giving good instructions would assist.  It could
implement a wizard which would suggest changes to add license notices
in files, and add them automatically if the user wishes.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]