[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:59:09 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> that touches on another point, which i did not mention (because
> it is a weak one) - in terms of practicality, the criteria
> _effectively_ is: "insists on the GPL"; because, in practice,
> 99% of code under permissive licenses does not identify the
> license of each file
I disagree with that step of reasoning.
It's not a lot of work to add license notices to a work
under a weak license. This feature would warn the developers,
and if they did not want to get the warnings again, they could
add appropriate notices to the files.
It's like satisfying a compiler warning.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, (continued)