repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:59:09 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > that touches on another point, which i did not mention (because
  > it is a weak one) - in terms of practicality, the criteria
  > _effectively_ is: "insists on the GPL"; because, in practice,
  > 99% of code under permissive licenses does not identify the
  > license of each file 

I disagree with that step of reasoning.
It's not a lot of work to add license notices to a work
under a weak license.  This feature would warn the developers,
and if they did not want to get the warnings again, they could
add appropriate notices to the files.

It's like satisfying a compiler warning.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]