[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:54:17 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> again, "that repo" would not be exceptional in this regard - i
> checked sourceforge and gitlab - those do not offer to install
> license files; so they do not even "list them"
That means they are even worse than I expected.
If forges set a standard we should really despise,
To accept that low standard won't make repos we prize.
We should keep our standard where we meant it to be,
And adjust all the details for the facts that we see.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/01
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/02
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/03
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/18
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/19
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/30
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/07