[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 2021 10:30:15 -0400 |
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:19:19 -0400 Richard wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > "we recommend that your choose the GPLv3-or-later"
>
> > if so, then why not add a new criteria at the A+ level:
>
> > "we recommend that your choose the AGPLv3-or-later"
>
> Sorry, could you show me a diff so I understand the proposed change?
>
the first was just a question - if there were a similar sentence
nearby the license selector, would that alone, satisfy A2?
Encourages use of GPL 3-or-later as preferred option. (A2)?
then, a suggestion - why not add a new criteria at the A+ level?
Encourages use of AGPL 3-or-later as preferred option. (A+6)
, such that a similar sentence would satisfy A+6?
eg: "we recommend 'AGPLv3-or-later' or 'GPLv3-or-later'"
is it not better to encourages the AGPL?
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org,
bill-auger <=
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/02
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/03
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/04
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/05
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/07
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, bill-auger, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Richard Stallman, 2021/04/17
- Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/18