[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and
From: |
me |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and project maintainership in general |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:27:07 +1100 |
Thanks all good faith to give this nice project another life !
Sorry not to be able to help coding, could only test if needed.
Greetings from South Pacific !
>
> On 27 juil. 2019 at 17:37, Eric L. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Hello again (in the morning for me), in more length and with a fresh mind,
> and after having gone through all thread answers, let me give a lengthy
> position: 0. I'm the EricZolf referenced elsewhere, who has a branch finished
> for Linux with the migration to Python 3. I'll post a note after this e-mail
> into the PR 40 to prove it. 1. it's great to see that there is still a
> community of users, I didn't realise, else I'd have communicated earlier. I'm
> now on the mailing list so all is good. 2. I started the migration effort
> because I didn't want to lose my backup tool once Python 2 is out of support,
> else I'm an IT guy with quite a lot of Ansible background (Python!), one
> wife, 2 children, a consulting job and little time, but making the best out
> of it. 3. Initially, I didn't want to create my own definitive fork but
> wanted to give sol1 a chance to become active and take their job as
> maintainer seriously. As Otto noticed, I wasn't very successful till now. I
> would have given them the Summer to react and then I'd have gone my own way,
> without a clear idea how to create a community. 4. Knowing now that there is
> still such a community alive (thanks to Otto!), I'd suggest following
> approach: a. I'll ping a last time sol1 and ask for their position. b. In the
> meantime, review my PR, it's huge, no chance to merge anything else before
> it's merged back into master. c. I merge back into my master based on your
> feedback. d. A last task is required before others can start and I would ask
> your patience a last time: I want the whole code to be PEP8 conform before
> others contribute to it, and I think (but open to discussion) that it's best
> done if one person does it in one go. e. Once this is done, I would second
> Patrick's suggestion and create an rdiff-backup project, open it to the
> community and push my repository to there for further common work (I wouldn't
> like to lose my repository because I have 30+ issues I've created as I went
> through the code). A few more side notes: A. my PR isn't tested against
> Windows and Mac, feel free to test and push fix PR against my branch on my
> repo and I'll merge (it should work, never tried, else I'll merge manually).
> Please focus on regression bugs that we get quickly this huge branch merged.
> B. I'm fully with Patrick regarding CI/CD, if you know tox, you'll see that I
> have a good start and one of my next moves would probably have been to
> integrate tox with GitHub's pipeline. C. This and anything else like web
> page, a mailing list we own, release process, and pending issues, we can
> discuss together once we've agreed on the big plan. Let the discussion roll,
> happy to be here, happy to hear there are others who care about rdiff-backup,
> thanks to Otto for kicking this! Eric On 27/07/2019 01:17, Eric L. wrote: >
> Hi, > > I've just finished the migration of rdiff-backup to Python 3
> after months of work, improving at the same time the test framework. Anybody
> can check and feedback at https://github.com/sol1/rdiff-backup/pull/40
> without paying money > > The quality seems equal to the version 1.2.8
> packaged under Fedora, Windows and Mac support wasn't a priority though. >
> > Feel free to save the Debian package, there is enough work for more
> people, but we should avoid useless work and forks. > > KR, Eric(Zolf) >
> > On July 26, 2019 4:36:24 PM UTC, "Otto Kekäläinen" wrote: >> Hello!
> >> >> There has not been any new releases of rdiff-backup since 2009. If
> the >> original maintainer does not intend to work on this project, could I
> >> please be allowed to take over? >> >> I am a Debian Developer and
> active in multiple open source projects. >> Our company supports many open
> source projects (seravo.com/opensource) >> and since we also use
> rdiff-backup, I could get some funding and man >> power to for example
> complete the Python3 migration. I know Python >> well and have recently
> contributed Python code to AppArmor upstream, >> so I think I am
> technically competent. With 20 years of open source >> experience I believe
> I can be a good steward this project. >> >> Rdiff-backup is marked for
> autoremoval from Debian on August 8th. I >> hope we could get some
> responses and activity on this soon so I have a >> chance to save
> rdiff-backup in Debian. >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rdiff-backup >>
> >> That do you think? >> >> If you are in favor of this please let me
> know by starring >> https://github.com/Seravo/rdiff-backup >> >> If I
> get more than 5 stars I will begin the Python 3 migration and >> also
> pulling in the best commits from the existing forks that have had >> most
> activity: >> - https://github.com/ericzolf/rdiff-backup >> -
> https://github.com/ardovm/rdiff-backup >> -
> https://github.com/hosting90/rdiff-backup >> -
> https://github.com/orangenschalen/rdiff-backup >> (see
> https://github.com/sol1/rdiff-backup/network) >> >> >> - Otto
> _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing
> list at address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL:
> http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
>
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and project maintainership in general, Eric L., 2019/07/26
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and project maintainership in general,
me <=
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and project maintainership in general, Bill Harris, 2019/07/26