Re: [Otpasswd-talk] GPL and OpenSSL

[Tomasz bla Fortuna]

Dnia 2009-12-28, o godz. 07:14:16
Tomasz bla Fortuna <address@hidden> napisał(a):

> Dnia Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:29:20 -0800
> Luke Faraone <address@hidden> napisał(a):
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 16:38, Tomasz bla Fortuna <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Just tell me what to add to the license information (how this
> > > exception should be stated) or if it is easier to just switch to
> > > BSD.
> > >
> > 
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html seems to
> > have a pretty solid explanation.
> 
> 
> > 
> > It's cool you're doing Debian package! I use Debian a lot on my
> > servers
> > > but never really done any package for it. I guess 0.4 is kind of
> > > old to be using it, there's a tag in repos 0.5pre1 which I know
> > > that was working and better than 0.4, but is too pretty old
> > > currently.
> > >
> > 
> > Cool. If you like, I can grab a release from git, but I'd prefer to
> > continue using GPG-signed downloads from Savannah.
> > 
> > By the way, could you generate a manpage for /usr/bin/otpasswd? I
> > tried using help2man, but otpasswd doesn't handle --help or
> > --version.
> > 
> 
> I'll try today/tomorrow to stabilise current version, check tests,
> install it, tests in system and generate initial manual etc. disable
> global db or make it work and publish 0.5.
> 
> Tags in git are signed as well but it's bigger hassle to
> check this and download.
> 

I'll drop requirement of openssl at all. I've got gpl3 sha256 from
coreutils and I have to find rijndael with known licensing and gnu gpl3
or modified bsd license.

-- 
Tomasz bla Fortuna
jid: bla(at)af.gliwice.pl
pgp: 0x90746E79 @ pgp.mit.edu
www: http://bla.thera.be

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature