[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again.
From: |
Shayne O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again. |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:28:47 +1000 |
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:54 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:55:48AM +0200, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:55:54 +0200
> > address@hidden wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:31:22 -0400
> > > Dave Robillard <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why do you want to choose a new name?
> > > I think om is just integrated and gets known more and more.
> > > It would be bad to choose a new unknown name.
> > > Scar
> >
> > vote++
> >
> > what has gotten into you, dave? om-synth is a great name.
>
> Yeh, Om is way cool.
>
I reckon Om is the way to go as well.
Shayne
- [Om-synth] The name. Again., Dave Robillard, 2006/06/01
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., Dave Robillard, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., Ross Clement, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., grae, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., Dave Robillard, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., grae, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., Dave Robillard, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., grae, 2006/06/02
- Re: [Om-synth] The name. Again., Dave Robillard, 2006/06/02