[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT
From: |
Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:36:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt |
Roland Arendes wrote...
> I looked into the source of eMule 0.30c and found these snippets. I hope
> it helps to use the ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT-Flag to identify mldonkey without
> left_bytes, eMule-Hashfake or other tricks. We (you) should negotiate with
> the emule-devs to implement this correctly.
i dont think the emule-devs will be any help at all...
> If you remove left_bytes like suggested by someone in the forum, mldonkey
> is recognized as a hybrid client (by eMule) - this is not the way we
> should take, I think.
i dont think this is a problem at all. the problem is mldonkey <-->
server not mldonkey <--> emule....
and even IF we correctly identify as mldonkey we still get banned from
all lugdunum servers...so ATM i dont see any other way than hiding the
mldonkey_id and pretend to be a hybrid....
--
Before replying see www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/using-mailing-list.html
The truth is out there? Does anyone know the URL?
- [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Roland Arendes, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT,
Martin <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Roland Arendes, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Martin, 2003/11/20
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, spiralvoice, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Martin, 2003/11/20
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, spiralvoice, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Martin, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Guido Seifert, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Guido Seifert, 2003/11/21
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, spiralvoice, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] ET_COMPATIBLECLIENT, Ken Bradshaw, 2003/11/21