[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: [Mldonkey-users] 2.02-20 working great!
From: |
Pierre Etchemaite |
Subject: |
Re: AW: [Mldonkey-users] 2.02-20 working great! |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:19:35 +0100 |
Le Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:32:37 +0100, "tristate" <address@hidden> a écrit :
> yes, your patches are nice, but after 3:00h now i seen
> 1574 eED's (9%) and up/down nothing. The speed is ok
> but not good! all version after 2.02-6 are slow here.
You mean, even versions without my patches ?
If so, your problems are not related to them.
Also, my current 'cs' output with 2.02-20+pango20030226a:
Uptime: 16918 seconds (0+04:41)
Client| seen | Downloads | Uploads | Banned
------------+-----------+------------------+------------------+----------
Total | 48794 | 210.5 12.7 | 156.1 9.4 | 0 0%
eDonkey | 7631 16%| 110.7 6.7 53%| 26.9 1.6 17%| 0 0%
old mldonkey| 17 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%
new mldonkey| 803 2%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 29.8 1.8 19%| 0 0%
Overnet | 2690 6%| 0.2 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%
eMule | 37445 77%| 99.7 6.0 47%| 99.4 6.0 64%| 0 0%
trusted mld | 202 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%
The downloads were much faster at the beginning (up to 24kB/s, with no
popular file), but it could be because I waited for a long time in many
queues, with a client that couldn't start downloading, so I had a big
(waiting) score with several eMule peers.
AW: [Mldonkey-users] 2.02-20 working great!, tristate, 2003/02/26
Re: [Mldonkey-users] 2.02-20 working great!, Brett Dikeman, 2003/02/26