mediagoblin-userops
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Userops] Why is it hard to move from one machine to another? An ana


From: 韋嘉誠
Subject: Re: [Userops] Why is it hard to move from one machine to another? An analysis.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:02:32 +0200

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Dave Crossland <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Asheesh
>
> On 8 April 2015 at 15:20, Asheesh Laroia <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> "Docker container" means large disk footprint.
>
>
> I don't think this is so; Docker containers are mostly misused as full
> system images, because people using them have used vm systems that pre-date
> container systems and haven't upgraded their mindset.
>
> Again, "Containers will do to apt what apt did to tar" - its like folks
> using dpkg like it was tar, `dpkg -i *.deb`, instead of setting up an apt
> repository and apt-get'ing those packages (which with ubuntu ppa
> infrastructure is now more common.)
>
> I think the difference between Sandstorm containers and a Docker containers
> is a key understanding.
>
> Docker _can_ containerise a full system image, but its not an ideal, 'post
> containerisation' use pattern... Can Sandstorm?
>
> AFAIK, no, and that means using Sandstorm is, de facto, a 'post
> containerisation' usage pattern.

Going briefly off-topic, I'm curious when "post-VM" VMs are going to
start happening. There's a lot of gooey hardware-management stuff
happening in VMs that don't have actual hardware, where it should all
just be what amounts to APIs to the hypervisor. What Mirage OS[1] is
doing is really interesting, but it's far from mainstream yet.

Actually it's tangentially on-topic, because Mirage OS in particular
is also about deployment -- your service is just one binary that you
run right in your hypervisor.

[1] http://www.openmirage.org/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]