RE: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule

[Shah Bijal]

Looking at it in Windows 2000, it appears that copy, rename and move are 
built-in shell commands, so they should behave in the same way - I would have 
said this was a bug. I looked in job.c and move isn't in the list of built-in 
shell commands.

HOWEVER... This appears to be a Windows 2000/NT4 issue - in Win 9x and DOS, 
move is an explicit standalone program.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 12 May 2003 05:38
To: address@hidden
Subject: FWD: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command
at all, when using in rule


Anyone with any thoughts on this please add them to the bug or just send
them along.



--
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the
addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Any use not in accordance with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.
The E-Mail transmission can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
CANAL+TECHNOLOGIES will not therefore be liable for the message if modified.