|
From: | Earnie Boyd |
Subject: | Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule |
Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 07:47:27 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes: >> HOWEVER... This appears to be a Windows 2000/NT4 issue - in Win 9x >> and DOS, move is an explicit standalone program. ez> Right, and that explains why "move" isn't there to begin with. ez> However, with the proliferation of the NT family descendants of ez> Windows (W2K, Windows XP, etc.), we probably should add "move" to ez> the list. What's the impact of having extra commands on the list for earlier editions of Windows?
It could be conditioned: OSVERSIONINFO os_info; memset (&os_info, 0, sizeof (os_info)); os_info.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof (OSVERSIONINFO); GetVersionEx (&os_info); if (os_info.dwPlatformId == VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT) { Add ``move'' to list of internal commands; } Earnie.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |