[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, w
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 23:43:22 -0400 |
%% "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>> HOWEVER... This appears to be a Windows 2000/NT4 issue - in Win 9x
>> and DOS, move is an explicit standalone program.
ez> Right, and that explains why "move" isn't there to begin with.
ez> However, with the proliferation of the NT family descendants of
ez> Windows (W2K, Windows XP, etc.), we probably should add "move" to
ez> the list.
What's the impact of having extra commands on the list for earlier
editions of Windows?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- FWD: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Paul D. Smith, 2003/05/12
- RE: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Shah Bijal, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule,
Paul D. Smith <=
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Earnie Boyd, 2003/05/13
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/13
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a commandatall, when using in rule, Greg Chicares, 2003/05/15