[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, w
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2003 06:20:02 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 23:43:22 -0400
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>
> What's the impact of having extra commands on the list for earlier
> editions of Windows?
For the DJGPP (a.k.a. DOS) port: none. The DJGPP library's functions
which invoke commands always search for executable programs _before_
they consider internal shell commands. Thus, the DJGPP port already
looks for move.exe before it invokes the shell's builtin.
For the Windows port: it could fail the rule on Windows 9x. But the
alternative is to fail on the newer versions of Windows, so I think we
should cater to the newer versions. We could also code a run-time
check for the Windows version, but I don't know how to do that;
perhaps someone else on this list could suggest the necessary
Windows-specific code.
- FWD: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Paul D. Smith, 2003/05/12
- RE: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Shah Bijal, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Paul D. Smith, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule, Earnie Boyd, 2003/05/13
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a command at all, when using in rule,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [Bug #3542] DOS 'move' command is not treated as a commandatall, when using in rule, Greg Chicares, 2003/05/15