[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ready for 2.21.80?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: ready for 2.21.80? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:10:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.1 |
Am Montag, den 26.10.2020, 16:59 +0100 schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
> Le 26/10/2020 à 12:06, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> > […]
> > Changing directory before invoking lilypond-book might solve this
> > problem and help against similar issues in the future:
> > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/479
> >
> > This looks good in preliminary testing, both with separate build tree
> > and for in-tree compilation. To be sure, I'm currently doing a full
> > build with GUB. In the mean time, I'll investigate if it would be
> > feasible to revert !347 without too many conflicts...
> >
>
> Applying MR 479 onto the translation branch work fine: snippets in NR
> are again translated, and snippets.html as well when building in-tree.
Thanks for testing! Now merged into master and picked into stable/2.22,
so hopefully fixed.
Cheers
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Dan Eble, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/29
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/31