|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: ready for 2.21.80? |
Date: | Sat, 31 Oct 2020 15:30:33 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 |
Nuked the build directory and redid configur, etc., and all now looks good, thanks. On 31/10/2020 15:16, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 15:08 +0000 schrieb Phil Holmes:Fails trying to do the PO make: phil@ubuntu12:~/lilypond-git$ make -C $LILYPOND_BUILD_DIR po-replace make: Entering directory '/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/lilypond-git/build' /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/.././make/stepmake.make:116: /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/../stepmake/stepmake/toplevel-vars.make: No such file or directory /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/.././make/stepmake.make:123: /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/../stepmake/stepmake/toplevel-rules.make: No such file or directory /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/.././make/stepmake.make:125: /home/phil/lilypond-git/build/../stepmake/stepmake/toplevel-targets.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target '/home/phil/lilypond-git/build/../stepmake/stepmake/toplevel-targets.make'. Stop. make: Leaving directory '/media/IntelSSD/lilypond/lilypond-git/build'Hm, these files are gone since August. Is that a fresh build directory, with the source a checkout of stable/2.22? What puzzles me is that it (apparently) worked for 2.21.7 and there has been no change to the PO infrastructure since then (only before).On 29/10/2020 15:52, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2020, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:As the title says. We still need to merge the PO translations (see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/476 ) and pick them to stable/2.22. If you speak one of the concerned languages that I've been hijacking the translation for (ca, eo, es, it, nl, sv), please consider giving it a short look. I'll also merge the translation branch to stable/2.22 before asking Phil for a release.All items from my list are done (above + fixing the translated snippets when building in-tree) and stable/2.22 looks good from what I can tell. So, I think we're ready for a first release candidate. Phil, if you have time, could you run a build on stable/2.22? I will stop picking fixes into the branch to avoid any interference (commits to translation can of course continue). Regards Jonas
-- Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |