lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: migrating to GitLab


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: migrating to GitLab
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:05:03 +0200

On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:51 AM Jonas Hahnfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, den 09.05.2020, 16:11 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> > On May 9, 2020, at 15:13, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > ->CS At any rate, I think that we should have appropriate CG
> > > > instructions at the time we make the switch.  They don't have to be
> > > > perfect (the CG has a much lower editing bar than the NR), but they
> > > > need to be in place, IMO.
> > >
> > > It's sort of a hen and egg problem: if we want to have all that before,
> > > it increases the workload for those preparing the migration and they
> > > have to guess.
> > >
> > > I totally agree that the CG should reflect the new workflows.  But at
> > > the time we do the switch, those new workflows are still in flux.
> >
> > I understand Carl's perspective, but I'm on the side of jumping in.  I 
> > don't expect that we'll be inundated with newbie contributors between now 
> > and the time we figure out what to put in the CG.
> >
> > Maybe we could put in a minimal note referring to the project on GitLab and 
> > explaining that a more thorough CG revision is pending.
>
> Sure, I can prepare such update. But as written roughly the same time
> yesterday, we need to release 2.21.2 in order for that to be uploaded.
>
> In any case it's not clear to me whether I should prepare for the
> migration today or not. This would be less frustrating if other high-
> volume developers (including but not limited to David, Han-Wen, Werner)
> commented on the plan...

Sorry. I'm fine with the migration going through today.

We'll all be confused for a few days, but given that gitlab is more
standard infrastructure than what we have, I think we'll figure it
out.

I suggest:

* removing write access to issue tracker from me, so patch upload
fails appropriately
* stopping the job that mirrors staging => master (I think it runs
automatically?)

--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]