Re: GUILE 2/3 and string encoding cost

[Thomas Morley]

Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 22:36 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
<address@hidden>:
>
> Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 21:52 Uhr schrieb Karlin High <address@hidden>:
> >
> > On 1/22/2020 2:07 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > Do we have a standardized test file for benchmarking performance?
> >
> > I can't speak to "standardized," but I do remember some threads that had
> > benchmarking going on by various users, using large LilyPond projects.
> >
> > The Robert Carver "Missa Dum Sacrum Mysterium" from Vaughan McAlley.
> > (114 pages)
> >
> > <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00700.html>
>
> I took that file and compiled it with 2.19.83 and LilyPond-2.21.0/guile-3

(NB: without patch for Issue 5666 applied)

> Although, I didn't apply convert-ly, which may be a problem or not.
>
> The results:
>
> 2.19.83
>
> 1. run
>
> real    3m38,352s
> user    3m24,493s
> sys    0m4,659s
>
> 2. run
>
> real    3m33,635s
> user    3m23,291s
> sys    0m4,563s
>
>
> 2.21.0 with guile-3
>
> 1.run
>
> real    9m41,223s
> user    11m36,337s
> sys    0m3,600s
>
> 2. run
>
> real    9m25,902s
> user    11m20,798s
> sys    0m3,743s
>
> Cheers,
>   Harm